Formula One Racing

Archive for the ‘RACISM’ Category

Tea Party TV streaming, video Tea Party Black Caucus 2
http://www.teapartyexpress.tv

Speech William Owens’ in The Tea Party />

Racist! Racist! Racist />

Racism exists in America, but the word has lost its historic significance. If my white brother would use the word, now bear with me “nigger” “in a friendly and playful to me before my black brothers, that would be considered racist. But if my black brother greeted me with the same jovial jokes , no one is offended. It is understood and agreed on.

Throughout history, the word racist to say that one race is genetically superior to all other races, which meant it should have dread for my life and my family. It appears in the “slavery”, “lynching” and “not in here” … today the word racist is becoming trivial, has lost its power. This word must be respected.

RACISM diluting a “trump card” – spits in your face

In the words of a fantastic King of America … Martin Luther, Jr. “At the end we will remember not the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends.

Today, due to political correctness, that is all Americans are becoming slaves of the perceptions of others. This has to stop or lose their right words.

Hello, my name is William Owens. My wife of 25 years, Selena, and I have traveled the U.S. and have spoken in over 150 demonstrations Tea Party Express. We live up to our Constitution, our freedoms and all Americans who want to restore our fantastic country. As an author, have written books on spiritual warfare, our President, and the recovery of America.

Regardless of political party or pigmentation, education or muscle mass media as a nation, we have a failure: We are quick to judge and slow to forgive, they often lose sight of what is game. Why? Because unlike our Founding Fathers, who still see no real threat of our enemies the way they saw the threat of their own. We are losing sight of the goal of America: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We must stay in the words of the Constitution. “Forming a more perfect union” a Constitution that reminds us of our imperfections … is said to be NO is a perfect … but more and more perfect. My friends, this takes the unit.

words of Benjamin Franklin would serve us well: “if it hangs together, without doubt, hang separately.” Tea Party groups would do well to recognize the strength of the cornerstone of the UNIT.

We must recognize that organizations like the NAACP and its leaders are again falling into a form of slavery. But, that slavery is not one of the chains and borders. Is the enslavement of “silence” the words of truth under the guise of racism. Again. You are a racist, you’re a racist, I’m a racist. If we are to be slaves, then we will be slaves to the unity, compassion and like. Martin Luther King wrote: “Hatred paralyzes life;. Edit the like that hatred confuses life, like that brings the hatred darkens life;. The like that glows.”

My friends, the “Trump Card” of racism has become an insidious form of censorship that mocks real dialogue and debate that can restore the United States. We must unite, we must forgive. In this note, the lack of these features NAACP should speak louder than distracting their claims of racism in the Tea Party Movement.

In reflecting on the past two weeks, I reckon the media fall into the trap of the media. Even Glenn Beck fired for not confronting the real enemy. While I know your concern, I emphatically that the Tea Party Express is not the enemy and should not be condemned. We are all fighting for Americans looking to us to guide them in taking back our country. It should not be discouraged by delving into irrelevant issues or even serious errors. I’m sure we’ll do a small more on the road. But I have concern, even in expressing my concern, unless you stumble upon this human weakness we all share.

Finally, let me address the resignation of Mark Williams, President of the Tea Party Express. Regardless of intent, the response of Mark to the claims of the NAACP were reckless, and proved to be counterproductive to the movement of the Tea Party. Marcos apologized and we accepted his apology and he has been forgiven. Also, the Tea Party Express “slow to address the behavior of Mark, of course, has made doubts about our own fundamental values. Suffice it to say that our slowness in no way be construed as racist or tolerate racism, but grew out of our loyalty a friend, not in defense of his words. And yes, we are still friend Marcos.

Now we have to find the excellent side of it and build a bridge of many divisions. I reckon the party Movement tea is that bridge.

While all of our playbooks are different in the Movement of the tea party, the final area is the same: to reduce the size of government agents intrusive and receives strong and constitutional tax back to the front of leadership in Washington, DC,

I am committed to my family to the cause of Freedom, Liberty and Constitutional Heritage, that are as expensive as American Conservative BLACK. My ancestors, both black and white, fought shoulder to shoulder with other patriots to secure and maintain the freedoms endowed to all Americans. LATIN fighting the kidnapping of our culture, our words of meaning -.

I pray that together, we can use our platform to unite and not divide further, to build, not ruin, and to forgive and not hold grudges that harm. Each one of us should be about the business of making peace for the like of God, family and country. we can all use our influence for the excellent of America and the preservation of our future for our children and theirs to come.

Thank you and raise the shield of faith to the United States.

Thank you, Mr. President, Barack Obama Muslims appreciate the boycott of the UN? Conference on Justice? A comment on the news!

Mr. President, Barack Obama Muslims appreciate the boycott of the United Nations – Conference on Justice? A comment on the news!

Yahya Hasan, Ph.D.

I read this news today from the Los Angeles Times (LAT) Headlines: Monday, April 20 “The United States remains far from the summit against racism” as a title, then a small more detail: “Washington is boycotting the UN conference, citing concerns about anti-Israel sentiments” As you can see very detailed title of the conference is right, but. the LAT, which he describes as “the conference against racism” in the title of flattery: the term “racism.” So how does this happen? It may be the Los Angeles Times would have us believe that the UN is a racist organization, support for the Palestinians. The conference was held in Geneva, while most countries attended except, of course, Israel bound states like the U.S., New Zealand, Netherlands, Germany, announced the boycott “as well as” Germany, Australia , Canada, Israel and Italy, who also said they would not participate. These countries do not represent the entire West, fortunately. But most vital, which supported Israel for so long.

So far so excellent, President Barack Obama will receive support for Israel on this occasion, after the show back in Turkey and in the 20 Member States conferences and NATO’s birthday 60. The message for the pro-Israeli U.S. and Israeli extremist government, says Barack Obama is not selling to Israel yet. This situation stems from Israel and its friends, for sure, but make the Palestinians outraged. They just need the recognition he suffered in the recent war in Israel, while justice is absent. That’s it. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

What would be the reaction of the Muslim world?

I suppose you will forget the lack of attendees, for the sake of diplomacy, after all, do you reckon President Obama sincere in his speeches, and that’s what counts in the first place. In addition, they have no weight in the global community who do not attend conferences. Boycott this conference, I reckon, for the United States, divides the world more than before and the challenges of NATO solidarity members. And it can undermine the U.S. strategic plans overall NATO force. Especially when some European allies are needed for the future of NATO and the cooperation of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This is the UN “the first world conference against racism in eight years,” the paper repeats the word “racism”, as desired, to remind readers. Not use the term “ant-Semitic,” which is I reckon, is a breakthrough in media bias in the U.S. may be also to satisfy the Israeli lobby in Washington. The newspaper added that “for dread that Muslim countries plot to require reporting criticism of Israel and the bar of Islam.” What is the legitimate concern worldwide criticism after the 22 days of the Israeli invasion of Gaza to celebrate the new year. I do not reckon it was intended for the Muslims. This is a news-production on the outcome of the conference. At least seven countries besides the U.S. probably will not attend. Or as the newspaper says, “boycott the event.” Thank God, they are repeating the hideous term “racism.” Moreover, the newspaper was unfair, saying that Obama brings to the U.S. “would boycott” with regret “the one-week meeting in Geneva, which is experiencing most of the disputes and political struggles marred the 2001 conference in Durban, South Africa. ” He added his own words: “. I want to attend a conference that addressed helpful continued racism and discrimination throughout the world”

Well, Mr. President, the racist policies of apartheid Israel described as a president above is not sufficient for racism and discrimination. Or the daily practices of the IDF against Palestinians, or the issues of Jerusalem to confiscate land and houses, and their replacement by non-racist Jews, is not enough to convince to attend such a conference on justice.
The journal brings readers to the Durban conference for NGOs, whom I call the silent majority of morality, to see justice throughout the world, but were described by Obama as “people expressed antagonism towards Israel in ways that were often completely hypocritical and counterproductive. “Well, this quote seems hypocritical statement of some non-governmental organizations attended the conference in Durban. It is an vital comment from the president of the United States for its face value.

The President added according to the report in the Los Angeles Times “We said in the run-up to our concern that this conference if you take all of the language since 2001, which is not something you can sign up to” said Obama.

Well, Mr. President. What do you expect of those who witnessed the atrocities of the armed forces of the IDF and planes against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip for 22 days? [Oh, I must say, the IDF defending Israel's war of security, which are the Palestinians?] The manifestations include Jews, Christians, Muslims and atheists gathered in Europe, U.S., and in many other countries? Do you expect Mr. President, in a soft conference, with soft words of diplomacy? So Israel and its supporters will not be affected? Well, I reckon the answer is now known.

I reckon the results of the conference of the UN, citing concerns about anti-Israel sentiments. Or the final draft United Nations declaration are “implicit criticism of Israel and an attempt by Muslim governments to prohibit all criticism of Islam, Islamic law, the prophet Muhammad and other tenets of their faith.” [This is a excellent composition of the media] According to the press. Another reason may be that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will speak on the first day.

An advice to President Obama, is to be neutral when it comes to the Middle East conflict, Muslims can not be easily tricked into politics, I advise the President to be clear about the two roles of the United States for a long period of time in this case, the Muslims and the U.S., to know that their feelings [at the same time make all the power of Israel], the term justice has to be taken into consideration before deciding to “boycott “a UN conference that can claim right statements about the Israeli action. [There will be documentation of the conduct of the IDF] The only positive reaction to the President “to boycott the conference is that I’m sure the anti-Arab and anti-Muslims in the United States reviewed the stereotypes made about leadership U.S. president. Everyone knows what I mean! Is to fill the Internet. (1080 words)

Hasan Yahya is an Arab-American academic, Professor of Sociology, wfol.tv columnist, Malaysia, and TINA International News Agency, Michigan, USA. www.hasanyahya.com

Anti-fascism as an ideology in itself

Introduction

“anti-fascism has too many contradictions as an ideology”

Fascism

when defined in a broad sense is the opposition to fascist ideology or power organizations, individuals and government bodies. In general terms, comprises those who have participated in direct action or those who simply disagree with fascist ideology. Political parties in the past and in modern times have been associated with political movements. Most of these latter groups mentioned are synonymous with certain ideologies, including socialism, communism and anarchism.

During the twentieth century, anti-fascism was expressed in various events. An occurrence as it was in Spain. At that time, there were strong clerical fascist forces that were introduced by Francisco Franco. Consequently, anti-fascist movements formed to oppose the ideology of Franco. These latest moves are characterized by the anarchist militias. Anti-fascism was also visible in Italy, anti-fascist uprising in the twentieth century were responsible for the release of the fascists. Mason D ed, (2003)

Perhaps the most striking representation of anti-fascism has been seen in Germany. This was during the Nazi era in the 1920′s. Antifascist at this time had a militant view. Antifascist said then that it was necessary to defend themselves from those who supported Nazism. This was because they felt vulnerable to their actions and could not be protected by another outside force, as the State. But this view has been criticized for aggressive another version of anti-fascists who believe that violence should not be part of this principle. They argue that this form of blaming the changes to the real authors of their own anti-fascists. (Banton, 1998)

In light of these facts, some contradictions arise in the definition and practice of anti-fascism. These latest developments are discussed below in order to show that anti-fascism should not be regarded as an ideology in itself.

Wed antifascism capitalist dictatorships can cause

antifascism has the danger of changing the capitalist governments in dictatorships

Anti-fascism as an ideology

compatible with class working class (the bourgeoisie). This means no more anti-fascists involved in causes that are subject to changing political ideologies of the day. Such drastic political change does not come without a price. Most times, the government of the day rise against these motions and therefore defeat the very purpose of the anti-fascists.

This was especially visible during the time of Hitler, but he realized that the only way the government could have power over his people was through repressive fascist orders revoked. With this in mind, the best anti-fascism that the purpose for which it was made and therefore can not stand alone as an independent ideology.

contradictions’ revolutionary anti-fascism “

Anti-fascism

opinion arises from the need to eliminate the ideological dictatorship. In that context, they can apply the same ideologies that are trying to remove during the realization of its objectives, but must use other means that are less oppressive. antifascism therefore goes hand in hand with democracy versus dictatorship. This is a fact that is synonymous nature and logic of anti-fascism. (Gray, 2007)

But, there are cases where a change antifascism support a political embodiment. You can be against fascism and not being a fascist . The former means an individual who is opposed to the thoughts / ideologies presented by the fascists. They regard the acts of people like Hitler and Franco as terrible. But, a fascist is someone who has a viewpoint against a political threat or a fascist state and that they consider the party as an enemy to be eliminated at all costs. This means that the appearance of “revolutionary anti-fascism” inevitably becomes a contradiction, because it includes an element Communist. The problem with communist thoughts is to eventually come into conflict with the original principles of anti-fascism.

There’s a fine line between revolutionaries and anti-fascists. This is because fascists are supposed to use only democracy to impose change, while the revolutionary communism is supposed to use to enforce the change. But sometimes, these tactics can be used by fascist distorting the clear distinction between the revolutionary and anti-fascists and undermining the ideology. (Duave , 1997)

An example in history occurred in 1936, when there were few Spanish workers against fascism. They did this by fighting against the state, ie they wanted to restore democracy and also acting against the fascists. But over time, the Spanish workers succumbed to institutionalization. It started to treat the fascists as their bosses and those allied with them became his followers. In this sense, became anti-fascist. Therefore, a fine line between those who oppose fascism and anti-fascists. The latter have political connotations and may even be regarded as less effective. They are less effective because anti-fascism should not take actions to address capitalist with fascism. This was in France, where people were trying to fight the French National Front. But at that time women did not show up for demonstrations because they realized they would have to meet a social order deep conviction. Regarding the above facts, the anti-fascism is a concept that can easily be blurred or poorly known, therefore, does not merit consideration as an ideology in itself.

Anti-Fascism as a tool to further divide members of society

antifascism Some critics have argued that the ideology serves to divide the working class in other categories. The only difference between fascism and anti-fascism is that one uses a concept of ethnicity, race, culture, etc. to divide members of society while the second uses the concept of democracy, but the end result remains relatively the same, the creation of separate groups. antifascist differ between classes. (International Communist Current, 2007)

Taking an example of a company that pays all its workers in the same amount, regardless of race, therefore, represent the fact that all People are the same. But when the company decides to give union workers a different amount of non-unionized workers as a result of anti-fascism efforts will be followed by a kind of division within that organization. But, the essence is anti-fascism serve as a unifying force, emphasize the fact that all people are equal regardless of background or other reasons. In this context, anti-fascist promote solidarity through the emphasis on humanity, but in the process of making making another division consists of conforming and nonconforming. In light of these contradictions, anti-fascism is not a concept that can stand as an independent ideology.

similarities between fascism and

anti-fascism should be seen as an ideology in itself, then you have to stand out from fascism altogether. But, this is not the case, though the two ideologies have different motives initially, and its final results are the same. Both fascism and anti-fascism achieve totalitarianism. This means the unification and integration of members of the working class. The two thoughts to encourage participation in society. Fascist totalitarianism achieved through the thought of eliminating some “enemy” that have been identified. This becomes a common goal among members of the nation and thus meet totalitarianism. Anti-fascism totalitarianism does as a matter of principle. Usually the movement is characterized by or unions whose main program is to include all members of society. (Barrot, 1982)

During the early twentieth century, the Nazis hoped that more of the earth through the use of the term “space better position life, “this was one of the promises that lured people fascist causes. Had the capacity to provide the resources urgently needed. But, there was a similar desire in the mind of the fascist too. Most anti-fascist movements have been known to fight for a better distribution of resources, especially to the working class. In the end, the two ideologies both want the same thing.

fascism and also to use the same methods to promote the participation of the working class. This was in Germany. Before 1929, the State used a number of union workers to supervise the activities of the revolutionary proletariat and to keep under control. But after that fateful year, the unions themselves were ruined to keep workers under control. Similarly anti-fascism is also characterized by the use of labor unions. This is because these unions are used to protect the interests of the working class to defend against political pluralism. These similarities between the two main counter show that anti-fascism can not be regarded as an independent ideology because it is so similar to fascism in a number of ways. (Gray, 2007)

blurred definitions of fascism

Because the concept of anti-fascism is based on opposition to fascism, then the latter concept should be very clear definitions . This means that any lack of clarity in the definition of fascism means that there will be a lot of discrepancies in the definition of anti-fascism. Therefore anti-fascism as an ideology is undermining its own. Fascism has begun being misused in parliament today especially with respect to <-! Nextpage -> members opposing. It is common for one party to another fascist mark. Also commonly found in other countries calling others the same. This usually occurs when a country seems to be a strong capitalist state. (Diner, 1945)

Fascism has lost its relevance in today’s society, especially the developed capitalist states. This is because there are no real parts and states can be seen to adhere to the fundamental principles of fascism. These are: the unification of capital and the strengthening of the state. A real fascist state has these two main objectives, but usually fail in achieving these two objectives, because fascism mostly serves to divide rather than unify state. Like most fascist activities are related to that tale today after anti-fascism as an ideology contrary to fascism, it will not be valid today.

antifascism not enough speed

In addition, anti-fascism employs the use of unions. This is because these unions perpetuate the thought that everyone is equal, regardless of their differences and should be treated equally. But, these unions are primarily focused on the interests of the working class at that time. In the twentieth century, meant that they could focus on general problems in the state as the reorganization of capital. Over time it became an obstacle to revolution. The unions were supporters of capitalism, but is derailed from its main objective to try to serve their own interests or trying to ensure their survival. This was emphasized by the majority between 1918 to1921, where there was an attempted revolution in Germany, but not completely (Duave, 1997)

anti-fascism is a disguise of capitalist reforms

anti-fascism is not an independent ideology, because there are some hidden thoughts that can be revealed after critically examine the principle. Anti-Fascism says that it is protecting the bourgeoisie in the struggle for democracy that was defrauded by the Capital. Thus, the principle used to connect two different concepts, namely the reform of capitalism and the working class. Antifascist aimed at achieving democracy increasingly by the working class in the context of capitalism. In the process of doing, there is a gradual shift to democracy. (Key, 2006)

Consequently, the performances of anti-fascism is the acquisition of power by the Capital. If anti-fascism is continuously applied in a particular state, then serves to further divide the state. Antifascism takes an unrealistic view, but attempts to unify society through democracy. But this is not an effective way to solve the problem of a separate company. What does anti-fascism is simply to strengthen the rule rather than applying a democratic state. In light of these facts, anti-fascism is illusory and achieves results separately as originally plotted. There should therefore be considered as an ideology in itself.

Anti-Fascism as a rigid principle

There are a number of contradictions that arise in the process of understanding anti-fascism. This stems from the fact that anti-fascism is often idealistic views. The principle has been demonstrated throughout history that does not conform to the changes. This implies that there has been some struggles seen before in the history of class struggle but have failed to change for the better anti-fascism. Sometimes the thought can be seen as an attempt to preach a series of what he sees as the truth to a world that is ignorant of the truths call or simply choose not to hear.

But, remember that this revelation as we have said does not imply an endorsement of fascism. There is a tendency to classify individuals indicates some weaknesses in anti-fascism as supporters of fascism, but this is not necessarily right. It simply demonstrates that there are some weaknesses in the thought of anti-fascism and should not therefore be considered as an ideology in itself. (Gray, 2007)

Anti-Fascism can solve the problem of racism? No

deemed anti-fascism as an ideology in itself, then it should at least be able to solve one of the worst problems afflicting society and divide;. racism

Anti-Fascism tends to lose the right causes of racism. This is mainly because there are a number of substantive issues that do not stand out from the beginning. Racism is anti-fascism as a separate item that can be included in the main program of struggle against capitalism. To effectively manage racism, one must achieve a principle requiring thoughts that are exactly the opposite of racism. (Camatte, 1988)

The main cause of racism is the fact that some people consider others as different from them. (Lentin, 2004) Thus an ideology that can effectively combat racism is one that contains the points of view that all people are the same. That all people in society have a common aspect, that is his humanity. But, that focuses on anti-fascism is the class struggle. It is a common thing to hear a fascist by saying that a “white” workers should be paid the same as a “black” workers, but you can hear them complain about the differences between what a “boss” and to win a ‘normal’ worker wins. This means that your approach is different, but tend to emphasize the similarities between people of the same kind of work and the differences between different classes. It is very common to see several moves to unify the proletariat class, but can not combat racism. This negates the validity of considering anti-fascism as an ideology in itself, since it is not possible to address the most vital issue in a separate company. (Barrot, 1982)

Anti-Fascism as an exercise in futility

Anti-Fascism has been criticized by some as an exercise that will continue over time and can not reach your goal long term. This implies that there may be a futile exercise. In Jean Barrot ‘anti-fascism fascism’ the book (1982) says that

The fight

for democracy is not a shortcut that allows workers to make a revolution without realizing it. The proletariat only ruin totalitarianism through the destruction of democracy and all political forms, at the same time. Until then there will be a succession of democratic systems’ fascist ‘and’ p in time and space …’

therefore not There is need to define an ideology that s based on a struggle that is constant over time.

Differences between the root causes of fascism and anti-fascism

anti-fascism tends to lack of depth needed to address the problems of fascism. Anti-fascism does not know the cause of fascism. There is a certain level that the ideology of fascism came to the anti-fascist people’s minds do not know or if they do, then there described him very well.

fascism succeeded in capturing the action of the masses for their ability to be relevant to the daily efforts of the members of society. The driving force behind fascism is its ability to solutions that can be applied directly to the lives of people. The genocide that come with it are not the main reason people are attracted to fascist causes, according to these people, genocide is simply a means achieve ends. This point appears to be an enrichment of their daily lives. It should be noted that solutions claiming fascism to provide members of society, of course, fake. end up exposing the contradictions that have been produced by capitalism. ( Gray, 2007)

Other than that, fascism tends to return to the past. is somehow able to mask the thought that mass murder is inconsistent with capitalism, a point of view that support firmly and enforce. So in this sense, fascism is a state of fake consciousness. For example, if a swastika reactionary started making life very hard for their ‘enemies’ or even kill them horribly, then it can be very hard for reactionaries to pull support from the masses. But if it is shown that these atrocities that one way or another to solve the problems of someone then maybe their support would be different.

Fascism is an ideology deeply, because their ability to use the liberal rhetoric as anti-fascism is itself a form of capitalism. But the main difference between fascism and anti-fascism is the fact that fascism may be able to use violence in the process imposition of market relations with the proletariat. Besides this, fascism has the ability to mutate over time while holding on to their principles. antifascist therefore need to know the deeper truths. In this case, all remains constant, even when mutated fascism is the fact that the latter is clearly opposed to internationalism and nationalism done as a byproduct. (Stewart, 1995)

The questions highlight the fact there are some deficiencies in the way deals antifascism fascism. The very nature of anti-fascism that is negative is that point of view, so there is a high probability of fans who feel they have an vital role in society can change very quickly to become fascists. This thought is reinforced by the fact that anti-fascism should not be regarded as an ideology in itself.

Conclusion

Anti-Fascism must be considered as an ideology in itself, because there are several inconsistencies in principle. Firstly, there is a lack of clarity in the definition of the revolutionary and anti-fascists and the latter terms can be misapplied. Moreover, there is the possibility of anti-fascism continues to divide society, but on a different basis of fascism, the working classes. antifascism addition is not very different from fascism. This is because the tactics used to achieve their goals and the final results of trade unions ie <-! nextpage -> and totalitarianism, respectively. The latter elements are also present in fascism, thus presenting a contradiction. Another contradiction can be seen in the fact that anti-fascism is an illusion, but tries to solve problems through democracy and instead increases the more capitalist power. antifascist faces the danger of a continuing struggle that never achieves its ultimate goals and that democracy must be ruined before that fascism is eliminated and this can not achieved. (Gray, 2007)

Anti-fascism as an ideology is not viable because most of the initial intentions are just done, for example, anti-fascism can cause dictatorships through attempts to change the political ideologies. The Ideology is not capable of reaching speeds as has been demonstrated by many cases in history. Anti-fascism has also been unable to solve the problem of racism deemphasising problems of humanity and focuses on class movements. Finally, no anti-fascism know the causes of fascism and therefore can not be effective as an ideology that can stand on its own. (Diner, 1945)

reference

Gray, J. (2007): anti-fascism, the worst product of fascism http://www.geocites.com/ recovered accessed January 18, 2008

Diner, D. (1945): on the ideology of anti-fascism, a magazine Diner

Duave, G. (1997): The Eclipse and the resurgence of the communist movement; antagonism Press

Barrot

, J (1982): fascism / anti-fascism, Jack Black Press

CPI (1962): the Italian communist left, a contribution to the history of the Revolution Movement, a journal of the CPI

Camatte (1988): Echo time; unpopular Book Publishers

Stewart H. (1995): Green Anarchism exposed, a report by the Alliance Neoist

Key, A. (2006); Beating Fascism anarchist anti-fascism in theory and practices, the collection of Kate Sharpely

International Communist Current (2007): anti-fascism justifies barbarism, a report of the International Journal

Banton, M. (1998): Racial Therios , Cambridge, CUP

Lentin A, (2004): Racism and Anti-Racism in Europe: Pluto Press, London

Mason, Ed.D., (2003), explaining racial differences, Bristol, Policy Press

Noah and the tale of her son

Noah and his son in the Qur’an:

Yes, Noah had a huge problem with your child.

Noah was one of the fantastic messengers.
His son was incredulous.
This is the problem that finished with the dramatic death of his son.

Here, the tale of Noah and his son, according to the Quran: />
Noah was sent home.
Noah said to worship God.
Most people refused to accept the assumption Noah Noah is just a human being like them and their followers are inferior to them.
Noah denied the thought that he is a liar.
Noah lived about 1000 years.
He had refused to infidels for many hundreds of years.
God told Noah that none of your nation will believe anyone who has already believed.
God told Noah to build the ark and not talk to God on those who do evil. They all drowned
God told Noah to take into account (the Ark) a pair of each species and family (except one from whom the word has been spoken) and those who believe.
His son refused to go into the ark, Noah cried to his son who was apart, “Come up with us, my son, and not with the unbelievers’
His son said: “I seek refuge in a mountain water to protect me.
The waves came between them, and his son drowned.
Noah called out to God, saying: “Oh Lord, my son was of my family, and his promise is surely right.
God said: “Noah, who is not family, not a excellent deed. Do not question me about things that have no knowledge.
Noah Noah said immediately apologized to God for Him to forgive and have mercy on him, />
This is the tale of Noah and his son in the Koran.

Sura 11:25-49

25 sent Noah to his people. (Noah said). “I am a monitor for you, and a bearer of excellent news />
26 worship none but Allah. I dread for you the punishment of a painful day.

27 The Council unbelievers of his nation said: ‘I do not see that is not a human being like us. we see that their followers are but the least among us, and his opinion should not be considered. Have not seen you superior to us, rather, we believe that liars.

28 said: ‘What do you reckon of my nation? If I have a clear proof from my Lord and He has given me mercy from him, though hidden from you, we can force to accept when you despise?

29 my nation, why not question wealth for my wage is only with God. I’m not going to alienate believers, because surely he will meet with his master. But I can see that you are ignorant.

30 and, oh my people! Who will help me against Allah if I drive? Is it not then mind?

31 I do not say that I possess the treasures of Allah, and I do not know what invisible. I’m not saying I’m an angel, and I say to those who despise you, Allah will not give them anything excellent. Allah knows what is in their hearts. In fact, if this were so then it would be between the hurt and the wrongdoers.

32 which says: “Noah, they have played, and fought over with us. bring (down) upon us what we promised, if what you say is right!

33 He answered, ‘Allah bring it (down) on whether he, who never frustrated.

34 or benefit my sincere advice if I sincerely wish I advise that if God leads you astray. He is your lord, and I shall return.

35 or what they say: ‘I have made (himself)? “They say:” If I had to make, then the sin is on me. I reject the sins you do.

36 and was revealed to Noah: “None of your nation will believe anyone who has already believed. Do not distress yourself with what they can do.

37 to build the ark with our view (and protection), and as revealed. Do not talk about me in connection with the criminals, who drowned.

38 each time an assembly of his nation passed by him while he was building the ark, who mocked him. Then he said: “If you mock us, make fun of the fact that, as you laugh.

39 will know to whom a degrading punishment will come, and which fall into eternal punishment.

40 and when Our command came and the oven gushed (fourth with water), we said (to Noah): “consider (the Ark) a pair of each species and family, except one from whom the word has been spoken, and those who believe. And none, except a few believed with him.

41 he (Noah) said: “take. In the name of Allah will be its course and dockage. In fact, my Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.”

42 and therefore (the ark) ran with them in the midst of mountainous waves, and Noah cried to his son who was apart, “Come up with us, my son, and not with the unbelievers!”

43 but he answered: ‘I seek refuge in a mountain water to protect me. “He (Noah) said:” Today, there is no defense of the order of Allah, except those who have mercy. “And the waves came between them, and he drowned.

44 and was the one who said ‘the earth swallowed the water. The sky high! “The water dropped and the matter was completed. And the ark came to rest on (the mountain)” aljudi “and said, ‘is gone, the evil nation!”

45 Noah called out to his lord, saying: “Lord, my son was of my family, and his promise is surely right. You are the fairest of judges.”

46 said: “Noah, who is not family, not a excellent deed. Do not question me about things that have no knowledge. You are not to blame the ignorant.”


47 “Lord, I seek refuge in you from asking for what I have no knowledge. if I do not forgive and have mercy on me, I will be among the losers.

48 is said: ‘Noah, descend with peace from Us and blessings on you and the nations of people with you, and nations that give them pleasure, and after that visited us with a painful punishment.

49 which is the news that is not to reveal to you, neither you nor the country knew this before now. patience, the result is that the caution.

There are many fantastic differences between the tale of Noah and his son in the Bible against the Quran.

The Bible says that Noah dispute their nation for many hundreds of years.
It seems likely that Noah was not going to live in silence for many hundreds of years and never warned them.
The Bible says that Noah told his people to worship the Fantastic Lord Almighty.
The Bible never says that some of the believers did not belong to the family of Noah. The Bible says that believers were Noah and his family. The Qur’an says that believers were Noah and his family and some others who did not belong to the family of Noah.
The Bible says that the problem between Noah and his son was because he was drunk, and lies naked in his tent. His son Ham saw him in this condition. This was the problem with her son Noah as the Bible says.
This Bible tale to the “perfect, just and righteous” Noah down and disgrace to him as a man who gets drunk and foolish acts.
The problem with her son Noah, according to the Quran was because his son was a believer and died. The merciful Noah felt sorry for her son, but God told him not to feel sorry for him because he is a criminal.
It is fascinating that the Koran does not mention the names of the sons of Noah.
On the other hand, the Bible, named and classified excellent and terrible and black and damned one of them because of the “high” of Noah as the Bible says. Unfortunately, many millions of innocent people had been killed, enslaved and abused because of this biblical statement. It is suspicious that this tale puts biblical roots of racism, discrimination and slavery color.

In conclusion, Muslims believe that Noah was one of the fantastic messengers. Muslims do not believe that Noah was “drunk” and cursed his grandson. Muslims believe that Noah’s son was unfaithful and he died.

This article aims to compare the cause of the problem and his son Noah in the Bible against the Quran.
But, the full tale of Noah need another article.

Returning to the theme of my series of articles (1-56), this is my question to you smart readers: “Is the Quran quoted from the Bible”

?

The poor outcome of the second glass of wine

In Genesis 9, the first glass of wine Bible justifies Racism, Color discrimination and slavery. In this, the second glass of wine Biblically justifies.
Here in Genesis 19, the second glass of wine Biblically justifies committing adultery between the daughter and her father (Lot), a very shameful evil act that finished with the creation of two fantastic nations, Ammon and Moab.
The Bible says that Lot’s daughter said, let’s make our father drink wine, and sleep with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.
This contradicts biblical tale with science, behavior, social issues, etc.
It’s hard to believe that Lot did and never condemned what he had done.
In addition, the family of Abraham and the nation were not far from Lot and his daughters.
Could go there and get married and have children without committing adultery with his father, Lot.
Politically speaking, the Bible puts the two nations, Ammon and Moab down because its root is adultery between the daughter and father. But, the Moabite Ruth was the grandmother of the Lord Jesus
Mind with the Biblical tale, in addition, many parents in Western countries committed adultery with her daughters.
You intelligent reader is invited to read the tale of Lot in the Bible and the Quran, judge for yourself

Lot and his daughters in the Bible
Genesis 19
1] And there are two angels came to Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting at the gate of Sodom and Lot seeing them rose up to meet him, and he bowed to the ground;
2] And said, Behold, gentlemen, to turn in, I pray you, in the house of thy servant, and tarry all night and wash his feet, and ye shall rise early and go on your way. And they said: No, but remains in the street all night.
3] And he kept them greatly, and became him, and entered his house, and he made them a feast, and baked unleavened bread, and ate.
4] But, before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, surrounded the house round, both ancient and young, all people everywhere:
5] They called to Lot and said to him: Where are the men who came to you tonight? them out to us, that we may know.
6] And Lot went out the door to them, and shut the door behind him,
7] And he said: I beseech you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
8] Behold, I have two daughters who are virgins, let me, I beg you, bring them to you and you to them as is excellent in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing, it was that under the shadow of my roof.
9] And they said, Stand back. And he said, This one fellow came to inhabit and be himself a judge Now we will deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed hard against the man Lot, and came near to break the door.
10] But the men reached out their hands and pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door.
11] And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and fantastic: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.
12] And the men said to Lot, thou, thou here any more? son, and your sons and your daughters, and all you have in town, get them out of this place:
13] For we will ruin this place, because the outcry against them has grown fantastic before the Lord, and Lord has sent us to ruin it.
14] And Lot went out and spoke to his sons, who married his daughters, and said, Up, out of this place, because the Lord will ruin this city. But he seemed as one that mocked unto his sons in law.
15] And when the morning arose, then the angels hastened Lot, saying, Arise, take your wife and your two daughters who are here, lest you be consumed in the iniquity of the city.
16] And while he lingered, the men seized his hand, and the hand of his wife, and the hand of his two daughters, the Lord is merciful to him and bore him and place him without the city.
17] It happened, when it was taken away, he said, Escape for thy life, look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain, escape to the mountain, lest thou be consumed.
18] And Lot said unto them, Oh, no, my Lord,
19] Behold, your servant has found favor in thy sight, and thou hast magnified thy mercy, you used me to save my life, and I can not escape to the mountain, lest evil overtake me, and I die:
20] Behold now, this city is near to flee, which is small: Oh, let me escape there (is not it a small?) And my soul shall live.
21] And he said, Behold, I have also received your request concerning this also, do not ruin the city, which has spoken.
22 Make haste] out of there, because I can not do anything until you get there. Hence the name of the city was called Zoar.
23] The sun rose over the earth when Lot came to Zoar.
24] Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven;
25] and ruined the cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of cities, and the fruit of the earth.
26] But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.
27] And Abraham rose early in the morning to where he stood before the LORD:
28] And he looked toward Sodom and Gomorrah and toward all the land of the plain, and looked, and behold the smoke of the country rose like smoke from a furnace.
29] It happened, when God ruined the cities of the plain, that God remembered Abraham and sent Lot out of the midst of destruction, when he overthrew the cities in which Lot dwelt.
30] And Lot went up from Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him, because he was worried to stay in Zoar, and dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters.
31] And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is ancient, and no man on earth among us in the manner of all the earth:
32] Come, let us make our father drink wine, and sleep with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.
33] And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father, and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.
34] And it came the next day, “said the elder to the younger, Behold, I lay last night with my father: let us drink wine tonight also, and you to go, and sleeps with him, to preserve our father .
35] And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose and lay with him, and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.
36] Thus, the two daughters of Lot, his father.
37] And the first born a son, and called his name Moab, which is the father of the Moabites to this day.
38] and the younger also gave birth to a son and named him Benammi, which is the father of the Ammonites to this day

.
====
Lot and his daughters in the Qur’an:

Lot’s nation was homosexual.
God told Lot to warn and stop their acts of evil, but. Lot refused.
Allah sent some angels to Lot in the form of handsome men.
Lot nation wanted to have sex with Lot’s guests.
Lot Allah punished the nation and saved Lot and his daughters.
His daughters were more than two (at least three years and may be more).
The Quran says that Lot was the first nation in the history of mankind to commit homosexuality. The Qur’an says that Allah left a sign for the nation of Lot. This sign needs serious scientists to dig for
The Quran and Islamic teachings deny the Biblical tale of Lot and his daughters.
The Qur’an considers the site as a messenger had done his job perfectly.
The Qur’an describes Lot’s daughters, as clean and pure and never ever thought about sex with his father as the Bible says.

Sura 7:80-84

[80] also (sent) Lot said to his people: “Do you commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you
[81] “To practice your desires of men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds.”
[82] And the people answered him, but this, said: “The drive out of town: They are people who want to be clean and pure!”
[83] We saved him and his family, except his wife, who was left behind the
.
[84] And We rained on them a shower (of brimstone): Then see who indulged in sin and crime

!
Sura 11:77 – 82

[77] When Our messengers came to Lot, he was grieved on their account and felt himself powerless (to protect) them. He said: “This is a terrible day.”
[78] and people rushed toward him, and had long been the habit of practicing abominations. He said: “People here are my daughters: they are purer for you (if ye marry) Now they dread Allah and do not shame me about my guests there not among you a man?
“In fact you know very well what they want Well you know we have no need of your daughters!”
[79] They said
[80] He said: “I wish I had the power to suppress or I could take refuge in a powerful support.”
[81] (The Messengers) said: “Lot O are messengers of thy Lord, by no means come to you now travel with your family while still a part of the night goes on, and do not let none of you look back! : but thy wife (will remain behind): to her will happen what happens to people in the morning is the time indicated:. it is not the morning nigh?
[82] When Our decree issued, the returned (the cities) upside down and rained upon them stones of baked clay, spread, layer upon layer.
[83] Marked as from thy Lord: nor are never far from the wicked

!
Sura 15:57-74

[57] Abraham said: “What then is the business that you (have) sent (by God)?”
[58] They said: “We sent to a people (deep) in sin,
[59] “With the exception of the supporters of Lot: they are indeed (fee) to save (from harm) – all –
[60] “Unless your wife, that we have seen, is one of those left behind.”
[61] Finally, when the messengers arrived among the adherents of Lut.
[62] He said: “You seem to be ordinary people.”
[63], they said. “Yes, we come to you to perform that of which they doubt
[64] “We brought to you because it is inevitable, and certainly we tell the truth.
[65] “And travel by night with your family, when a part of the night (yet remains), and do you see the back, that no one among you look back, but you go from where they are sorted “.
[66] And We made known this decree to him, the last remains of the (sinners) should be cut in the morning.
[67] The inhabitants of the city came in (mad) joy (at the news of the young).
[68] Lot said: “These are my guests: disgrace me not:
[69] “But dread Allah and disgrace me not.”
[70] said, “Do we not forbid thee (to speak) for each and every one?”
[71] He said: “There are my daughters (to marry), if ye must act (so).”
[72] In truth, your life (O Prophet), in his wild intoxication, they wander in distraction, to and fro.
[73] But, the (mighty) Blast overtook them before morning,
[74] And We turned (the cities) upside down and rained upon them stones of baked clay.

Surah 26:160-174

[160] The people of Lut rejected the messengers.
[161] Behold, their brother Lot said unto them, ye not dread (Allah) /> [162] I am your faithful messenger.
[163] “So dread God and obey me.
[164] “No reward I question you that:. My reward is only from the Lord of the Worlds
[165] “Of all the creatures in the world, you approach men
[166] “And leave those whom God has made for you to be your partners? Yes, you are people transgressing (all limits)!”
[167] They said. “If you do not desist Lot O! You will surely be cast out.”
[168] He said: “I detest your doings:”
[169] “Oh my Lord Give me and my family the things as they do!”
[170] So We saved him and his family, all
[171] Except an ancient woman who was left behind.
[172] But the rest We ruined completely.
[173] We rained on them a rain (sulfur), and evil was the shower on those who were admonished (but not taken into account)!
[174] Verily in this is a Sign but most of them do not believe

.
Sura 27:54-58 />
[54] (also sent) Lot (as Messenger): behold, he told his people: "Do what is shameful if you see (its iniquity) /> [55] "Would you really approach men in their desires rather than women? Nay, ye are a people (Thick) ignorant!"
[56] But his people gave no other answer but this, said: “Expel the lot fans in your city: They are people who want to be clean and pure”
[57] We saved him and his family, except his wife: her we destined to be that far behind.
[58] And We rained on them a shower (of brimstone): and evil was the shower on those who were admonished (but not heard) />
Sura 29:28-35

[28] and (remember) Lot: behold, he told his people. “Ye do commit lewdness such as no people in Creation (ever) committed before you
[29] “Do ye indeed approach men, and cut off the road? And practice wickedness (even) on their boards?” But his people did not answer but this: they said: “Bring us the Wrath of Allah if it is right what you say.”
[30] He said: “Lord you help me to hurt people!”
[31] And when Our messengers brought Abraham the excellent news, said: “We are indeed going to ruin the people of this city, because they really are (addicted to) crime.”
[32] He said, “There is a lot there.” They said: “We know it’s there: doubtless saved him and his followers, except his wife, who is among those who are left behind!”
[33] And when Our messengers came to Lot, he was grieved on their account, and felt himself powerless (to protect) them: but they said: “Dread not, nor grieve: we are (here) to save you, and thy following, except thy wife: it is those left behind
.
[34] “To let down the people of this town a punishment from heaven because they have been perverse.”
[35] And We made it a clear sign to any person who (care to) know.

Sura 54:33-39

[33] The People of Lut rejected (his) warning.
[34] So We sent against them a storm with a rain of stones (which ruined them), with the exception of Lot’s home, we have made at the beginning of Alba,
[35] as a grace from Us: thus do We reward those who give thanks.
[36] and (Lot) said that Our punishment, but they disputed the warnings.
[37] And even tried to snatch away his guests from him, but blinds our eyes. (You hear:) “Taste My punishment and My warnings.”
[38] In the early morning a permanent punishment seized them:
[39] “So taste ye My Wrath and My Warning.”

Returning to the theme of my series of articles (1-57), this is my question to you smart readers: “Is the Quran quoted from the Bible”

?

The relevance of Hitler? S Views and its attitude toward the Jews
Speaking

twice the Alliance, we must say that in Hitler’s book Mein Kampf is written that he disagreed with this alliance, as the Austro-Hungarian Empire, regardless of the racial composition of its population or the government , would have no influence on the outcome of the war. Could have disputed his views on nationalism. But, it is obvious that Hitler believed that the alliance as a reason for Germany’s defeat in the war, and it is vital to know that their thinking is irrelevant and no matter whether right or incorrect. What matters is that Hitler would bring this ideology the first race with him as dictator of Germany. It should be noted that even today in many states like the United States of America, some people have the same views on nationalism as Hitler in his book. A person wishing to racial sovereignty also like racial segregation and so has a sense of racial superiority. One can always mask this desire with words such as nationalism, racial pride or even national sovereignty, and there is nothing terrible about them, of course, besides the fact that they use to mask racism.

From reading the book it is understood that Hitler despised anything and everything that had even a remote connection with liberal behavior, which is also denied by the concept of fascism itself. In fact it was an aspect that connects to the Jews, and that knowledge only strengthened his infuriation with the Jews. During the stay of Hitler in Vienna, the mayor of the same was Dr. Karl Leuger who founded the Social Christian Party. This person influenced Hitler’s early reflections on the Jews. Dr. Leuger wrote much of what he believed was the cause of the degradation of moral values in society in general.

Financial Crisis: End of World Delayed? It seems so

Supposedly the financial world nearly collapsed. This lie has much currency. Everyone writes speculative real estate and financial instruments totaling billions or perhaps only 2% of the world’s economy was Armaggedon [an ancient Hebrew word has nothing to do with the disappearance of the world] . Government made problems – forcing banks to lend to people without proof of income, low interest rates for too long, and a flood of money – is now attributed to “markets.” How ridiculous. Governments and politicians make the problem, then come in to “fix”. It’s laughable.

The “housing crisis” so excessive and exaggerated, there was no chance of destroying the financial system, the global trading system or “capitalism”. It is a very minor episode in financial terms far less than a trillion dollars is the real danger of government inspired speculation and crazy land rush. In fact the major banks and investment houses and the release of the statements that their repayments in the coming years, will be written up, that is, they have taken too many losses and the value of the underlying assets worth more than previously thought.

How is exaggerated this “crisis”? Consider the following:

Goldman Sachs estimates the total world wide mortgage or housing and financial instruments punishment: 0.2 billion

“Market capitalization of major banks and financial institutions listed on the New York Stock Exchange: trillion or 15 times the total income related to the housing mess.

-Total of liquidity in the bond market in the world:
billion
“The liquidity in derivatives worldwide: 0 />
State-run capital SWFs
billion
-Liquid Cash on hand at the top of Wall Street investment banks ONLY 4: 0 />
-United States GDP: 0.5 billion
-World Wide GDP: billions of
total stock market value worldwide of all trades:
billion
“The excess cash in the Federal Reserve, deployed on the ground: 0 />
Revenue growth in the U.S. 2007: 0 billion of

An objective observer who looked at this situation would be “because there are a few problems, but there seems to be more than enough money, liquid assets, real estate and back up of financial markets. Indeed. The reality is the estimate of 0.2 billion in writedowns on extreme ‘mortgage crisis’ is really a pittance. is 7% of the Bank’s market capitalization on Wall Street to March 31, 2008, which is 2% of world GDP and the bond market, it is 2 years of revenue growth, and that 1% of world market capitalization values. Yes 0.2 billion is a significant amount of money, but is the end of world?

Of course not.

The thought behind the current round of wild market despises the thought that if Bear Stearns, the fifth largest U.S. investment bank went bankrupt, the whole system would collapse. Trash. Every 5 years, a large bank or investment house is bankrupt, and the system performs very well. Bear Stearns was mismanaged entity that does not know what was in balance. 34:1 is leveraged, debt to equity. Fortunately Bear Stearns has no correlation with the balance sheets or the strengths of its former competitors

“Lehman’s liquid assets more than five times its equity. At Merrill Lynch & Co., the largest broker in the world, and Morgan Stanley, the second largest U.S. securities firm, the ratio is three times heritage. Goldman’s liquid assets are double its capital ……

“In the past 20 years, the U.S. securities industry has learned from experience how to navigate through financially stressful events that can hurt confidence,”Hintz, a former Lehman finance chief, said
In other words, markets are perfectly capable of responding to changing market conditions and asset prices again. If Bear went bankrupt the system and the world over. It would have been the same as the bankruptcy of Drexel Burnham in the 90′s, the valuable parts have been collected by competitors and life would have followed.

This is not to deny that there are problems in the financial world. But the main problem is not lack of regulation – there are thousands of laws rules in the financial world that are never used, or invoked. None of these bureaucratic minions were using their authority to prevent loans to people without income verification, for example. We do not need more arcane rules and fees even more expensive and bureaucratic. We need transparency, less government involvement and smarter, lighter regulation. The main problem is of course the government and its constant regulation – political meddling.

Back in the excellent ancient days of Jimmy Carter in 1977, the U.S. political class has made a law called “The Community Reinvestment Act [the sick and Orwellian do you reckon?], Which ordered that a certain percentage of bank loans and MUST mortgages to undocumented borrowers did not need to show proof of income or assets. The political thought was to force the banks to make more homeownership among minorities and the poor [you know the white end racism, etc. etc] and thereby stabilize the lower classes of American society and stimulate community and economic growth. But, these decrees by the government do not work and, in fact, that distort markets dramatically.

What happens when the government distorts markets, making the anti-silly reality? To make asset bubbles deflate at some point.

The CRA encouraged speculation on the buy of unqualified borrowers and ultimately, of course, the creation of loans that had small value. Combined with low interest rates from 2001 to 2004, simple money, relaxed the conditions of credit loans, the stage was set for a correction of large-market price. But, the market price adjustments may be positive. Now the U.S. homebuyers can buy valuable assets at reduced prices, with reasonable interest rates in a variety of vehicle loans and mortgages. The market in other words, it is clear the oversupply of housing at market prices rationally.

So what government want to do? After causing the problem first, want to make more regulation, more fees, more distortion and in the future, more problems. There is nothing more than irrational reasoning and delayed circular populist politics: “We have made a crisis of government incompetence, there are problems to be addressed, the population expected to vote on action, ergo we do more than caused the problem in the first place. This is a definition of madness.

The financial system has problems and issues, but the market can work. The “crisis” is completely exaggerated and blown over. From any point of the cancellations are lower, and the impact on the global system, while strong, is not overwhelming. There is enough liquidity, the central bank’s support, and financial strength to easily overcome the government made the asset bubble in real estate.

Too terrible that politicians and bureaucrats do not admit it.

A heinous act

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, did not mince words in issuing a statement denouncing the vandalism of 148 Muslim graves in the country’s largest military cemetery of the First World War this weekend.

Racism and sexist abuse was painted in the tombs, the head of a pig was hung from one of the tombstones and insulting slogans were also directly Justice Minister Rachida Dati, whose parents are from northern Africa.

“This is an unacceptable act of racism and the president of the republic shares the pain of the entire Muslim community in France,” Sarkozy said in a statement.

“This hateful act is also an affront to all combatants of the First World War, regardless of their religion,” he added, stressing that he wanted those responsible are apprehended and punished “, as he deserved.”

The desecration of the graves came in on Saturday night in the Muslim section of military cemetery of Notre-Dame-de-Lorette Albain à Saint-Nazaire, near Arras in northern France. Built in 1925 on the site of one of the largest battles of the First World War and contains the graves of 40,000 including 22,500 unknown soldiers.

The section of 576 Muslim graves is located at one end of the massive cemetery gravestones facing Mecca.

Sadly it was also the scene of a similar racist attack in April 2007, when Nazi slogans and swastikas were painted in about 50 Muslim graves. Two men were convicted and sentenced to one year in prison for this.

Although the word “graffiti” comes in many reports describing what happened at the weekend has shown, in fact, too soft a word of the slogans of hatred found on Sunday morning.

There was nothing ornamental or artistic at once. It was a case of vandalism pure and simple is expressed in terms of the most abusive language imaginable and disgusting.

The politicians are unanimous in their condemnation and a junior defense minister, Jean-Marie Bockel, quickly went to the cemetery on Sunday at the request of the president, where he held a minute’s silence in the name of a government.

A police investigation has been launched with about 100 officers being sent to investigate the incident.

An estimated five million Muslims live in France – or eight percent of the population – which is the largest Muslim community in Europe

.

Does the United States is threatening the future
I watch political shows on CNN and it’s incredible to me how much of the nation, especially white America can not accept the fact that the Black Man is really dominating the presidential race. It is certainly more qualified and has a qualified running mate in Joe Biden. On the flip side, a candidate has 72 years of age, who has aligned himself with President Bush on many issues, and America clearly see is total disaster Bush has in course, McCain has much more experience than Obama, the simple fact that is 26 years. But that’s like the 62 year ancient coworker in his office, just because it is 15 to 40 years more than others does not make him a better employee. In general, it is quite the reverse. He or she probably will not be very much at all, except walking around with a cup of coffee all day

McCain has a running mate with issues GALORE, so do not even go there. Palin’s supporters seem to have turned a deaf ear to everything that is happening with “that” and is willing to jeopardize their own future, they simply do not want a Black man in the Oval Office. White America may try to dress as they like, but to be honest, if Obama were white nation what we are talking about a landslide that this will be. America would be asking why McCain made such a wise choice not the vice presidential candidates.

Race in the United States still rules. This is why the reaction to the OJ murder case was divided along racial lines, because the rules of the race in the United States. OJ is in jail now for the rest of his life, but certainly not the point here. OJ murder case served as a barometer of race relations in America. Divided reactions clearly showed that we are, otherwise, the “not guilty” verdict would have been received with indifference the same as when Robert Blake (Baretta and Mickey from the original “The Small Rascals”) was found not guilty of murdering his wife. No one cared about Robert Blake. Do not make light of the untimely death of anyone, especially because of a senseless killing, but husbands killing wives (and sometimes grooms) on a regular basis in the U.S. and worldwide, and the nation has never been so emotionally involved as we were with the OJ case. The majority of blacks continued as OJ was a close relative, and most whites are behaving as if Nicole and Ronald were lost many brothers. How in the world can sit there and say the OJ murder case was not about race?

What are you looking America in the face now, is the first Black President. A Black man elected to the most powerful job in the United States, and arguably the most powerful position in the world. We are rapidly approaching 2009 and the U.S. is still blinded by racism to the point of sabotaging the future is very typical.

Why the United States was ready for Obama – Small Ancient Lady Gate of racist and Friends Black Next

In the run up to the primaries loved weekly discussions with one of my close friends. I was sure that Giuliani would be the next Pres. I answered that our former mayor was too socially liberal for the Republican base and very unpleasant for everyone else. My guess is that Obama would be the man. During the ’04 Dem convention when I cruise Obama to the podium like a young Smokey Robinson and sing like a superstar, he said, “That’s the next president.” Really, I thought it would be four years down the road. My friend was dead certain that America will never vote for an African-American, who were too racist and stupid. But I know that the argument over electoral drama. My reasoning was based on an ancient lady of New Jersey.

Betty is 83, daughter of immigrants and raised in a working class neighborhood of Boston. She has been programmed with all the racial stereotypes and resentments that were mitigated by the social stigma of racism that prevailed a half century later. His son, a longtime friend of mine told me that his mother went mad when he brought home an African American friend in first grade. “Never bring him here again. Never!” He experienced the same spiel about their black girlfriends in high school and later well into adulthood.

Pretty shocking eh? Really for me it was very shocking because I always liked Betty. When I was in high school it was amusing and generous – a favorite of moms favorite aunt and cousins of my friend. How would inhabit a charming poison such as Betty who left son freak-flag waving freshly painted and scrubbed the bedroom walls become a canvas for his radical friends obscene graffiti? The walls were left intact when he went to college, and the room is not repainted until the family went to a house a few blocks away. It is simple to see decent people, intelligent entertain some latent form of racism relatively benign – that is, never was expressed in a punitive manner. But Betty has made it clear that anyone of a minority whose skin was darker than Betty could be subjected to humiliation. Betty was never struck by the ironic fact of their own minority status. It was a typical product of a pre-Freudian, pre-ironic generation and culture.

That was before a black family went in next to some time in the eighties. I laughed till I nearly choked when I was told.

A decade later told me that she offered to the house that the family itself, then his favorite neighbors when their house was ruined by fire how depressed he was when they went. It turns out that Betty had never really interacted with blacks or Hispanics before, never have known that middle-class versions of “them” there. And I saw that she Yuk with African-American customers at the wedding of my friend. Sixty years of programming is wiped out nearly overnight. And last month when she said she was voting for Barack Obama, his tone as matter-of-fact as if she had said going to the dentist on November 4.

infoheads While all are spitting on the Bradley effect, I knew that in the course of an entire generation of people like Betty million darker skin was “other” in television, film, neighborhoods, medical offices, supermarkets, in their children and grandchildren’s birthday parties and school plays. They have also been used to the gay and will probably vote against gay marriage ban when Obama is running for his second term.

There are millions of Bettys out there that will make America proud. You can take a cataclysm or one of “them” go in next door, but I have that confidence based on faith in Betty. She is change you can believe in.